Scenario 1: The Recalled Thermometer
A hospital network in Georgia has been using the same brand of digital thermometer across all of its clinics for three years. A routine audit reveals that the thermometers were miscalibrated at the factory — they consistently read 0.8°F lower than the true temperature. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the hospital used these thermometers to screen patients at the door, turning away anyone with a temperature below 100.4° F (the CDC threshold for fever).
A sample of patient screening records shows the following temperatures recorded on the day in question:
| Patient | Recorded Temp (°F) | Admitted? |
|---|---|---|
| A | 99.8 | Yes |
| B | 100.1 | Yes |
| C | 100.6 | No |
| D | 99.2 | Yes |
| E | 100.3 | Yes |
Discussion questions:
- The thermometer always read lower than the true temperature — never higher, never lower by a different amount. What does this tell you about the nature of this error? Would taking repeated measurements with the same thermometer help? Why or why not?
- What were the patients’ actual temperatures? Reconstruct the table with corrected values.
- Based on corrected temperatures, which patients should have been flagged as having a fever?
- What are the real-world consequences of this type of error in this context? Who is affected and how?
- How might a hospital design its measurement protocol to catch this kind of error before it causes harm?